<span>The answer is terror. Based from the images created by the author, the setting and description of the house is very dark. The image of the house is gloomy and that the people are very scared of its ambience. Based from the poem itself, the characters which is the narator and Roderick were very much afraid of the house. They believe that there is something that is haunting it.</span>
Shan is considered to be a first person narrator because he both tells the story and appears in it.
A first-person narrator would obviously use the first person pronoun (I) to refer to him/herself. So, the entire story is told from this person's point of view, using that particular pronoun. E.g. 'I saw him standing there...' is an example of a first person narration which Shan is an example of. If he were talking about someone else, it would be third-person narration.
The correct answer is B.In the limited point of view, the narrator shares the thoughts, feelings and opinions of one character; in the omniscient point of view, the narrator shares the thoughts, feelings, and opinions of all characters.
Explanation:
In narrative texts, the point of view determines the perspective used to tell the events in a story. In the case of the omniscient point of view, which is one of the most common points of view, the narrator has access to the feelings, thoughts, and similar to all characters, due to this, this type of point of view often includes references to the thoughts, feelings, etc. of all the characters involved or at least most of them.
In contrast, in the limited point of view, the narrator only knows the feelings, thoughts, etc. of a character which can be the narrator itself, considering the narrator acts as an observer, and therefore the reference of feelings and thoughts is limited to only one character. According to this, the correct option is B.
Ellie puts Coop on the stand the next day. This testimony turns intensely personal for a few moments before Ellie is able to get a handle on her emotions and direct Coop toward Katie and her treatments. Coop speaks about the dissociative state and how it relates to Katie's case. Coop suggests that the death of the infant from natural causes would be enough to cause Katie to block out the child's death. The prosecution questions Coop and tries to put holes in his case. Finding this to only be marginally successful, the prosecution asks Coop about his relationship with Ellie, suggesting their intimate relationship has something to do with his testimony.
Ellie calls Samuel next. Samuel speaks of Katie's character and the Amish way of life. When the prosecutor attempts to get Samuel to admit Katie is capable...
