Read the negative position from "Animal Rights Debate." It is clear that humans are superior to animals, and therefore animals should not have the same rights as human beings. The Greek philosopher Aristotle argued that only humans have the ability to reason. Animals only have instincts to guide them. Therefore, they are not sentient, or thinking, beings like humans are. In addition, humans show their superiority to animals through control. Humans have superior abilities that allow them to raise animals for a variety of uses. Human beings are in control of animal life, making animal rights unnecessary.
Which statement best uses the ideas of the negative position to provide an affirmative rebuttal?
Animals can show humanlike traits, such as cooperation and the use of tools.
The purpose of animals is to be either consumed or used, regardless of whether they can reason with others.
Even though humans can communicate their reasoning better than animals, animals like chimpanzees have shown that they reflect on their own thoughts.
In the United States, several laws have been created to ensure that animals should be protected from animal cruelty, regardless of their ability to reason.
Answer:
The purpose of animals is to be either consumed or used, regardless of whether they can reason with others.
Explanation:
The statement that uses the ideas of the negative position to provide an affirmative rebuttal is option B.
This is because, the negative position of the role of animals for use of consumption of other uses is brought to show that it is the prime use of animals whether they can reason or not.
To refute is done to something to show its wrong and should not be taken seriously.
A rebuttal is speech that contradicts a statement made by an opposing party.
