Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.
Make creative/funny videos for them to go viral amongst people to repost
Most likely, it will be India. Please mark Brainliest!!!
The applicable formula is;
A = P(1-r)^n
Where;
A = Final purchasing power
P = Current purchasing power
r = inflation
n = Number of years when P changes to A
Confirming the first claim:
A = 1/2P (to be confirmed)
P = $3
r = 7% = 0.07
n = 10.25 years
Using the formula;
A = 3(1-0.07)^10.25 = 3(0.475) ≈ 3(0.5) = $1.5
And therefore, A = 1/2P after 10.25 years.
Now, give;
P = $9
A = 1/4P = $9/4 = $2.25
r = 6.5% = 0.065
n = ? (nearest year).
Substituting;
2.25 = 9(1-0.065)^n
2.25/9 = (1-0.065)^n
0.25 = (1-0.065)^n
ln (0.25)= n ln(1-0.065)
-1.3863 = -0.0672n
n = (-1.3863)/(-0.0672) = 20.63 years
To nearest year;
n = 21 years
Therefore, it would take approximately 21 years fro purchasing power to reduce by 4. That is, from $9 to $2.25.
The entry for the dividend declaration is as following:
Debit Cash Dividend $12,000
Credit Dividend Payable $12,000
To acquire the amount we must multiply the dividend per share which is 0.06 with a number of common shares issued which is 20,000. Capston, Inc have to entry this transaction as the dividend declares although the cash has not yet disbursed to comply with the accrual principle.
The treasury stock must be ignored because it is the portion of stocks which held by the company in its own treasury and the amount of authorized stock because it is not yet issued and the company doesn't have the obligation to pay that portion of stocks dividend<span>.</span>
