I think 2 is your answer tell me if its right
The words that support the inference that making sugar was difficult are;
- "the work was governed by extremely tight, rigid discipline"
- "careful organization did not solve the second problem with sugar"
In describing the plantations that existed in Jamaica during the era of slavery, the excerpt mentions that between 50 and up to a hundred workers were required to work in the plantations.
The Muslims and Christians organized methods to use their slaves in the plantations. Still, these did not yield many results.
So, despite the rigid discipline and careful organization, sugar making was still difficult.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/13652825
The answer to the given question above would be the first option. The sentence that corrects the fragment by including it in the subject is the following one: Cities in many areas of the world have hosted the Olympics.
The PP (prepositional phrase) "in many areas of the world" specifies which kind of cities have hosted the Olympics and therefore includes the fragment in the subject. In the second sentence, "have you lived in many areas of the world", functions as the PP complement of the verb "to live". Finally, in the last example, "in many aeras of the world", the PP functions as a modifier of location of the main sentence.
C. is true
A. is incorrect because you are supposed to have at least two strong reasons for your readers to agree with your claim.
B. is incorrect because ineffective support should be eliminated in the revision process of writing.
D. is incorrect (duh!) because you should do more than the bear minimum.
