Answer:
D. (Both trails were created after railroads spread West.)
Hope this helps :)
Mark me BRAINLEST please.... :3
"Working for the election of sympathetic public officials" is the activity helpful to both public officials and interest groups.
<u>Answer:</u> Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
An employee of a leader of a political party, governmental authority, political candidate, official of a public international organisation, state-owned enterprise's officer or employee, including a state-owned etc are called as "Public official".
During elections many demanding duties come out which need participation from other people in most ethical and regulated way but under law. Indulging in duties or volunteering during elections of sympathetic public officials will be benefited to both the parties i.e officials and groups.
Yes of course, The United States fought to own the right of freedom to vote. The country is founded on the belief of democracy. That we have a choice to who we want to lead us.
^ ps I bs that whole thing haha sound good tho
You don't show options, so here are the different definitions
1. "the study of past events, particularly in human affairs."
2. "the whole series of past events connected with someone or something."
3. "a continuous, typically chronological, record of important or public events or of a particular trend or institution."
The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.
It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.
It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.
