Answer: it says that but you can try to let them give it to you for 7 if they say it's 9 just damage the box a little for a discount
Explanation:
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
The Bretton woods system of exchange rates relied on <u>"fixed or pegged exchange rates, with occasional orderly adjustments to the rates."</u>
The Bretton Woods arrangement of money related administration built up the rules for business and monetary relations among the United States, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, and Japan after the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. The Bretton Woods framework was the principal case of a completely arranged financial request expected to administer money related relations among free states. The central highlights of the Bretton Woods framework were a commitment for every nation to embrace a fiscal approach that kept up its outer trade rates inside 1 percent by binds its money to gold and the capacity of the IMF to connect transitory uneven characters of installments. Likewise, there was a need to address the trouble among different nations and to anticipate focused depreciation of the monetary forms also.
A) Mendez's ethical responsibilities are,
1)Competence
2)Confidentiality
3)Integrity
4)Credibility
B)The responsibilities of mendez if dalton gives her a direct order to book the sales are explained below.
Explanation:
1)
Integrity
Cometence
Credibility
IMA is highly regarded organization for accountants and finance professionals. The following four standard to which the organization holds CMA's accountable are
1)Competence
2)Confidentiality
3)Integrity
4)Credibility
2)
Mendez should refuse to follow dalton's orders and if dalton persists, the incident should be reported to the corporate controller of hester shoe company. Support for the linc managers should be wholehearted, but it should not require unethical conduct.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
