<h2>♨ANSWER♥</h2>
Cell phones have changed everyone’s lives since the 1980’s. Some of the cell phones we have today have internet so we can use them both, for work and for play. This is more than half of the time we spend. Cell phones change lives in a bad way because we become attached to them. They affect grammar and listening.
The apple company has come out with so many new apple products. That include about five different iphones. So many teens have the iphones now that everyone has been getting them. Having the iphone also helps kids to fit in. Even kids under thirteen have cell phones and text with them 24/7.
In some public schools kids use them during class and don’t even get in trouble. Even some teachers in public schools text during class or talk on the phone. So even adults are obsessed with their phones. If schools don’t take phones before school starts, then kids are going to think they can use their phones whenever they want. Teenagers are probably way more obsessed with their cell phones than adults though.
Cell phones also help us in a good way though. We are more connected with people than people back in the days were. If we want to talk to somebody we can just call them. When we’re out and we need to call our parents we can call them without having to use a friend’s phone and embarrassing yourself. Plus if we want to go somewhere we can call or text for a ride so we can also connect for travel easier too.
Cell phones are both good and bad for everyone. If we use them all day, everyday then thats a bad thing. If we use them for work or connection thats a good thing. We can use cell phones for many reasons. Cell phones can change everyone’s lives.
<u>☆</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>hope this helps</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>.</u><u>☆</u>
_♡_<em>mashi</em>_♡_
Answer:
How did canon law differ from governmental law? -Specific laws governed individual behavior. -Everyone was expected to obey the law. -The law included various beliefs of the Church.
Explanation:
How did canon law differ from governmental law?
-Specific laws governed individual behavior.
-Everyone was expected to obey the law.
-The law included various beliefs of the Church.
-Wrongdoers were punished for breaking the law.
He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
When I was little I cut a hole in my trousers because I didn't like them. I soon regretted this as I was then in a lot of trouble with my parents who had given then to me as a present.
