Answer:
Yes, I agree with Mack's argument because he was able to clarify and give enough evidence on how reading Shakespeare is similar to that of studying the real world and our own selves. It also emphasizes the integrity of the heart and mind and how such unity makes a person understand and become educated.
Explanation:
The question above is related to Michael Mack's argument <em>"Why Read Shakespeare?" </em>He provided evidence regarding the good side of reading the works of Shakespeare. For him, although <u>reading Shakespeare's works may seem hard at the start, reading it over and over again will allow the person to grasp its true meaning.</u> He also compared it to that of studying different courses in college and learning to play a particular music.
Answer:
Compulsory: Required of all people in a particular group
Eclectic: Describes something that uses information from a variety of sources
Rote: Method of learning by repeating something over and over again
The author thinks the setting can influence the story as much as characters can.
Answer: the way he only used short sentences when the prisoners were talking to the doctor or to each other way have been used to show how they were to weak or scared to talk a lot.
hope this helps
One of the thems
because they don't make any sense
