The first sentence of the last paragraph in the text connects to an idea presented in the first paragraph.
That sentence is:
<em>"You may be at ease with pine or hardwood, or find shade under the domesticated trees in your city park, but in the high desert. Joshua is our tree."</em>
<h3>What idea does this sentence connect?</h3>
- The importance of vegetation.
- The way trees are beneficial.
- The importance of trees for humanity.
The first paragraph of the text emphasizes the idea that botanical study and understanding vegetation is essential for our lives. This paragraph shows how important trees are and this is reaffirmed in the first sentence of the last paragraph which shows how trees are inserted into our lives in many different formats.
Learn more about what botany is:
brainly.com/question/21230064
#SPJ1
The correct answer is number 2. It introduces the topic and hooks the audience.
<em>The main purpose of the first paragraph of the speech It introduces the topic and hooks the audience. </em>
The Gettysburg address’ first paragraph, by Abraham Lincoln, introduces the topic and hooks the audience. The phrase that uses Lincoln is a biblical reference to “three score year and ten” which supposedly was the time humanity was supposed to live. Lincoln changed to “Four score and seven years ago…” to start its speech and catch people´s attention.
During a soliloquy, the character is just vocally presenting his thoughts without regard to the audience. The characters are basically talking to themselves. In an aside, the character wants to talk to the audience and is aware of it.
Answer:
A: Mocking to earnest: while the author ridicules the oracular woman, she assumes a serious tone when describing the woman of culture.
Explanation: In the first two paragraphs, the author’s contemptuous attitude toward the “oracular literary woman” is apparent. The author describes the behavior of such women as “the most mischievous form of feminine silliness,” and lines such as “she spoils the taste of one’s muffin by questions of metaphysics” clearly portray the oracular woman as an object of ridicule. On the other hand, when describing the “woman of true culture,” the author adopts a more earnest tone as she paints the virtues of this figure—her modesty, consideration for others, and genuine literary talent—in idealized terms. A writer’s shifts in tone from one part of a text to another may suggest the writer’s qualification or refinement of their perspective on a subject. In this passage, the author’s sincere, idealized portrait of the woman of true culture plays an important role in qualifying the argument of the passage: although the author agrees with the men in line 41 that the “literary form” of feminine silliness deserves ridicule, she rejects generalizations about women’s intellectual abilities that the oracular woman unwittingly reinforces. Embodying the author’s vision of what women could attain if they were given a “more solid education,” the figure of the cultured woman serves to temper the derisive (mocking) portrayal of women intellectuals in the first part of the passage.
