Answer:
The 12 tables were a codification of the customary law of the tribes that founded the Roman state, but was selected and amended according to the needs of the ruling class. they had a small number of provisions that regulate the exchange of goods, provides for severe sanctions against debtors, strict formalism of procedures, attachment to religion, etc. The main part of the law is dedicated to court proceedings and sanctions for torts. It contains several provisions on family and inheritance law, on the law of obligations and a few more provisions on property. One table is dedicated to public law and religion.
Explanation:
Roman law arose only when an attempt was made to codify the law of the Twelve Tables, the oldest Roman law passed 451 BC at the request of the plebeians to limit the arbitrariness of patricians. It got its name from the fact that it was written on twelve bronze plates and displayed on the Forum.
The text has not been preserved, but it has been reconstructed, probably not in its entirety, on the basis of quotations in the works of Roman jurists.
The Jews living there rebelled against their Roman reign. Emperor Nero decided that what they did wasn't okay, and he launched an attack against Jerusalem, the Jews' religious stronghold.
It turned into a slaughterfest of Legionnaires killing Jews and ransacking the city. This eventually led to the Romans burning down and destroying the Jews' Temple that served as the center of Judaism.
<span>Basically, many civil rights leaders felt the NAACP was an institution devoted not to expanding civil rights for all African Americans, but promoting the economic privileges of a small, black middle class. As I recall from my Twentieth Century Black Militancy class in university, for a long time the NAACP never pursued litigation to advance social justice for all blacks. It was perceived as an organization that was content to advance a certain amount of economic progress within the larger white power frame and without trying to change the existing white power structure, which was dominated by segregation and jim crow. </span>
One of the main reasons why primary sources are valuable to historians is because "<span>They give insight into the thoughts and feelings of a participant in history," since these are sources that originated during the time in question, and are "unaltered". </span>
