Answer:
1. Nigeria: Constitutional Monarchy
2. All Heads of Government are Presidents.
3. South Africa.
4. South Africa
Explanation:
- Nigeria has a constitutional republic form of government and is a sovereign country is located in West Africa and has executive powers that are exercised by the president who is head to the states and the federal government. He is elected by the popular vote.
- The head of the government is the second-highest official in the executive branch of a sovereign state. The head of the government is often called the head of the state and the relation between the head of the state and the president varies from a sovereign nation to a nation.
- South Africa is the southernmost country of Africa and is a parliamentary republic and the president appoints the cabinet and ministers and the voting rights denied to the population before 1994 were based on race in south Africa that was ended by apartheid.
John was one of the "inner circle" of Christ's disciples, along with:
<u><em>James and peter </em></u>
<h3>
<em>Inner circle of disciples went up to mount of transfiguration; Went with Jesus and fell asleep while Jesus prayed : (Peter, James, and John)</em></h3><h3><u>
<em>After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. _(Matthew 17:1 )</em></u></h3>
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
Answer:
Sir Charles Wood
Explanation:
Sir Charles Wood was once and widely known as the President of the Board of Control when India was still under British rule. During this period, in 1854 Sir Charles Wood so many recommendations to the then Governor-General of India concerning education. These recommendations were later known as Wood's despatch among which is the recommendation for the establishment of Universities in India.
