Answer:
240
Explanation:
I did the assignment and got it CoRrEcT (。・ω・。)
Always remember..
Never forget..
what was it again? I forget
Plus Ultra,
-Denki
The author is trying to establish the point that the food provided to the soldiers was of poor quality and in little quantity.
<h3>How can we identify this?</h3>
- The author shows how the food provided to the soldiers was compared to fodder, that is, food inappropriate for humans.
- The author shows how this food could be compared with the feeding of pigs, which highlights the poor quality of the food.
- The author reinforces how inappropriate food was consumed anyway, as it was all the soldiers had.
In the text, the author wants to draw attention to how the soldiers were neglected and fed in a precarious, unhealthy, and insufficient way, not being possible to compare it with food for humans.
This kind of food left the soldiers hungry and weak, preventing them from being able to fulfill their responsibilities as required.
In this case, the author satirizes food, trying to call attention to a change and showing the dissatisfaction of those who need to eat this way.
Learn more about satire:
brainly.com/question/20772859
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option: Very few French came to North America.
Explanation:
Marriages between French and Native American tribes seen in a good sight which helped them to interchange their culture as well as to maintain a good relationship between the two. When the French came to America, the settlers and trappers were only men and few in the beginning. Many intermarriages happened between French settlers and Native Americans than with any other European settlers in America.
Answer:
Once in the Americas, slaves were sold, by auction, to the person that bid the most money for them. ... When the slave ship docked, the slaves would be taken off the ship and placed in a pen like this one. There they would be washed and their skin covered with grease, or sometimes tar, to make them look more healthy.
The articles gave very little power to the central government and more to the states. Therefore, when the government leaders were trying fix the articles, they really had no power to. That is why, when the leaders had the Constitutional Convention, instead of changing the articles, they had to completely throw out the articles and start over.
