Answer: I would say E because the book was talking about how the poor can even enjoy a book from experience.
Explanation:
Answer: C
Explanation: hyperbole is exaggeration- a term that isn't technically true, it just kind of feels like it is because of the situation, like "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse," that sort of thing.
C is overreacting a little: "We will never be able to feel safe" ever again no matter what we do "unless we set a curfew." It's being dramatic to make the point that a curfew will help us feel more safe.
I think its C) Someone on a solitary path
As you may already know, societies around the world of all ranges of economical power continue to have certain predetermined expectations of citizens depending on their gender, which rules out the first option. The fact that the presence and misuse of gender exists in almost every society around the world, regardless of their economical sources and development (agrarian or not), means that option D would be equally insufficient. That leaves us with options B and C, which seem to represent the arguments for and against the continuation of gender roles in modern societies. Since the structural-functional theory defends stability, both options could be use in defense of a system that creates such, or against a norm that challenges such.
