Explain at least two ways that it was argued that experiencing nature is different than experiencing works of art. Why must we t

Question

3 years ago

15

Explain at least two ways that it was argued that experiencing nature is different than experiencing works of art. Why must we t

reat natural objects different than artworks? Explain scientific cognitivism and how proponents of such a view would explain our aesthetic appreciation of the Grand Canyon (be specific!). How would a proponent of one of the non-cognitivist theories presented (specify which theory) respond to the scientific cognitivist in this specific example? Do you agree with the scientific cognitivist, or the non-cognitivist, and why?

Arts

1 answer:

sergeinik [125] · Answer 1 · 2022-05-05T14:26:14+03:00

Answer: experiencing nature is different than experiencing works of art because art that comes from nature is not men made and it's all-natural while men made work of art can be representing a form of culture, religion, lifestyle,or even a special talent of one person.

Explanation: