If a person arrives on US soil and claims asylum, does the US have to deal with their claim under international law? Yes. Not only does the US have an international legal obligation to do so, based on the requirement of complying with the object and purpose of the 1951 Refugee Convention, and implementing legal obligations in good faith, it has an obligation to do so under its own domestic law.
The executive order cannot displace domestic legal obligations. So those who, with great difficulty, manage to reach the US will have to have their asylum claims examined. The duty not to return a person to a state where they may face torture or other serious harms is absolute under the UN’s Convention Against Torture. The US has signed and ratified this convention.
However, with the likely increase in asylum detention of people crossing the US-Mexico border that will arise from one of Trump’s earlier executive orders, there is potential for decisions on whether a person is a refugee being made in an exceptionally tight time frame. It’s possible that, more generally, asylum decisions will be rushed through and the law not properly adhered to.
Under international law, can the US ban asylum seekers from certain countries?
Under international law, the US cannot ban asylum seekers from certain countries. The US has signed and ratified a number of international treaties that prohibit religious and race discrimination in the operation of legal systems, and this extends to operating a migration system in line with international non-discrimination protections.
I belive that it is (D) becuse it sounds the best. But I cant give an definent answer becuse u did not give a pic of the passage.
<span>All you have to do it read it aloud, and see if the commas make sense.I found all ten :)
Think of this,
readers, when you have your next haircut. A Persian king had to get a
message to his military leader, a Persian general. The king shaved a
man's head, tattooed a message on his bare scalp, and told the man to let
the hair grow back. The man then traveled to find the general, but no one
knew he carried a message. When he reached the general, however, he
delivered the message. Yes, as you guessed it, he had his head shaved
again!
</span>
<span><span>I hope this helped! Please take the
time to rate, pick the Brainliest answer (not necessarily mine!), and thank me if you feel I
helped with this question! Thank you, it helps me a lot. :) </span></span>
Because they’re serious and can lead to further injuries if not treated.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
C is most likely the answer as they are all at the same table and are not engaging in family-like actions.