Explanation:
All staff members of the court should be impartial to all people at any cost. This is court staff members' duty that they should protect all people from all impartiality or other bad consequences that affect people very badly. They can protect from impartiality, unfairness, and injustice. There are rules that no one can connect with someone before the court. The court can provide the information to both sides of the party but could not advise legal information to anyone.
- It can provide the number of local lawyer services.
- It can explain how the court work.
Answer:
job availability
Explanation:
many people that went in prison have difficulty finding Employment and the majority 70% felt that criminal records have effect on their job search 2 months of the been released 40% of respondents have been employed at some point since leaving prison but only 31% were currently employed.
one study found that that white job applicants with a criminal record are of half likely to be called back for an interview black applicants are less likely to be called back in general but those with a record called back on your third as often as peers.
also background checks go back 7 years different type of background checks look different results and cover different lengths of time in Canadian personal history in general background checks that typically cover 7 years of Criminal and court records but can't go back any further depending on complication and laws of what's been searched.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It says it
"The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments."
Answer:
Check below for the answers and explanations
Explanation:
1) Standing is the process of examining the right of a plaintiff to take a lawsuit to the court of law.
Standing is important to ensure that the case brought to court is actually a dispute and not a contempt from an aggrieved party. It also ensures that the innocent is not unlawfully punished.
2) Sierra Club could have had a standing to file the lawsuit if it had an evidence or a likelihood of being injured or harmed
3) The Sierra club case led to the birth of a dissent that environmental objects should be regarded as persons in ecological matters.
4)The case did not have standing because it was filed by an organization and this conflicts with the Animal Welfare Act which stated that individuals and organizations do not have standing to file a lawsuit in a court.
5) Mr Jurnove, a worker of the Animal Legal Defence Fund was able to provide a substantial claim of the injuries he suffered when he saw the ill treatment the animals were subjected to by USDA.
Though other plaintiffs do not have standing, as far as one of them does, it will not be considered whether or not the others have standing. Therefore, the plaintiff had standing.
6) None of the plaintiffs that were acting on behalf of the dolphin met the requirement of "Injury in fact", a necessary requirement to have standing. None of them could give evidences of the injuries suffered as a result of the act by The New England Aquarium.
Answer:when the verdict of a case is challenged and asked to be reviewed by a higher court it is called an appeal. The higher courts look for the evidence for the reason the defendant was guilty
Explanation:
