Answer:
A
Explanation:
Property rights define the theoretical and legal ownership of resources and how they can be used. These resources can be both tangible or intangible and can be owned by individuals, businesses, and governments.
Random website i found on the internet 0_0
B. Both political parties really lost the trust of the black community.
Economic globalization forces local companies to compete with <u>foreign</u> businesses. To compete, businesses strive to offer the best quality at the lowest price. As a result, products get <u>cheaper</u> and more people are able to afford them.
In general, economic globalization is the mobility of people, capital, technology, goods, and services internationally, supported by the reduction of trade barriers among countries, improvements in technologies of communication, transportation, etc.; and that has contributed to the increasing interdependence of world economies.
Due to the facility in which goods and services of foreign business are able to reach to almost any country, nowadays local companies face a stronger foreign competition. If local companies don't strive to offer the best quality of a product or service they offer at the lowest price, they may be "kick out" of the game by a foreign business.
As a result of this competition, products get cheaper and more people are able to afford them.
Answer:
The reason that NAFTA was developed was because, during the trade negotiations with Canada and the U.S., there was a Free trade agreement that also brought Mexico along. On January 1, 1989, all Tariffs were eliminated, along with duties and restrictions. NAFTA helped with governmental procedures, settlements, intellectual property rights, and trades. NAFTA was well respected by Mexico and Canada after those negotiations between the states. NAFTA was even more appreciated when the negotiations were being conducted and seen in higher paying jobs in the U.S.
Answer:
Patrick Henry’s point of view is that the American colonists can no longer trust the British and should break away from their control.
I have but one lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves, and the House? Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sire; it will prove a snare to your feet.
Henry focuses on the opposing viewpoint that relations with Britain may improve. Henry responds to that viewpoint by acknowledging that there are people who view Britain differently. But he also provides evidence of why that viewpoint is flawed.
Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. . . . . Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the works, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging.
Explanation:
