1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elden [556K]
3 years ago
12

You read about a new invention in Techtopia. You consider traveling there instead. How much would your $100 be in Techtopian dol

lars? (PLEASE show work!)

History
1 answer:
iogann1982 [59]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

3. 40,000 TPA

4. i. The amount needed to buy the part in both Techtopia and Crosswater is 1 USD

ii. To reduce cost, one should travel to a location that has the lowest transport cost

Explanation:

The given parameters are;

200 TPA = USD, and 1,000 CSW = USD

3. The value of $100 in Techtopian dollars is given by multiplying the $100 by the exchange rate of 200 TPA per USD

Therefore, $100 = 200 TPA per USD × $200 = 40,000 TPA

The $100 = 40,000 TPA

4. i. The cost of the part in Techtopia = 200 TPA = 1 USD

The cost of the part in Crosswater = 1,000 CSW = 1 USD

Therefore, the amount in dollars needed to buy the part in each country = 1 USD

ii) Given that the cost of the part is the same in both locations, to minimize cost, it is best to travel to a location with the lowest transport cost to by the part

You might be interested in
What time did the great depression start?
kompoz [17]
<span>October 29, 1929 was black Tuesday the start of The Great Depression.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
Why was the war of 1812 significant to the united states answers?
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

The War of 1812 ensure the position as Independent country of United States.

Explanation:

The War of 1812 main cause was the non-acceptance of United States as an independent country by England. This war was not conclusive, meaning that neither party declared victory or defeat.  

The war brought positive effects like the increase of manufacture as the US stop importing merchandise from Europe. In the domestic politics scenario, it marked the end of the Federalist party who sided with Britain it was composed by the wealthy elites of society, while the Democrat-Republicans favored France and were the more for the "common man".

3 0
3 years ago
How did the political boundaries of the U.S. change from 1845-1853?
sweet [91]
The political boundaries of the U.S changed from 1845 to 1853 by increasing the territory and getting land as far out as California because the Americans fought the Mexican American war (1846-1848) that resulted in Mexico yielding the area we know as the Mexican cession have a nice day (:
5 0
2 years ago
I need Help plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
timofeeve [1]

Missouri Compromise

Kansas-Nebraska Act

Dred Scott v. Sandford

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·2 answers
  • HELP PLZ!! ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO BEST<br>-try your best to help! :):
    7·1 answer
  • How did mary save elizabeth's life in the crucible?
    6·1 answer
  • How does the quote “ if taxes are laid up an is in any shape without our having a legal Representation where they are laid, are
    14·1 answer
  • What is it called when a bank does not have enough money to pay back its depositors?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the political achievements and failures of the grant administration?
    9·1 answer
  • The policy of moving villagers to refugee camps, and then burning the villages was known as __________________-.. . . . . . A] t
    10·2 answers
  • A main goal of the Barefoot Schoolboy Act was to
    12·2 answers
  • During the 1920s, overproduction in what areas weakened the economy?
    6·1 answer
  • Some _________ emigrated to the United States, where they are known as
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!