I hope this answers your question..
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
Answer: can you explain what this is more?
D would be the answer because an imperative sentence is more of a request
In George Orwell's book "Animal Farm", Napoleon is represented as a scary and intimidating pig, who controls the other animals through fear and propaganda. In the book, the first descriptions of him were "fierce-looking" boar "with a reputation for getting his own way." as well. Napoleon was also a metaphor for Joseph Stalin, so the animals on Animal Farm see Napoleon the same way people saw Stalin. For example, both Stalin and Napoleon surrounded themselves with guards, they were cruel, and wanted power and were willing to use any means necessary to get it.
