Well for one, characterisation is how a writer chooses to reveal a characters personality in a story, through things like physical appearance (shiny hair, blue eyes, nice smile, ect.) and through virtues and faults (brave, attentive, smart - egotistical, bitter, evil.)
Figurative language is basically how you'd describe said chracterisations, through things like personification, hyperbole, metaphors, similes, ect.
So with that being said, figurative language can help characterise a monster by doing more than just saying it's a monster; figurative language can make it /feel/ like a monster to the reader. Figurative language can turn the monster '3-D' (for lack of better words), by saying it has long claws, stinky breath, vicious fangs, a horrifying growl, ect.
My favourite example of figurative language is actually in the childrens book "Where the Wild Things Are" by Maurice Sendak, because it uses simple figurative language. Maurice Sendak describes the wild things as so: "They roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible teeth and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible claws.'
Anyway, I hope this helped !! :-)
Answer
The topic of Human Biology and the Society
Explanation
According to the credentials and background, Gregory Stock can write on topics that <u>apply social science and humanity to invention programs in the field of biology, biomedical and health science as connected to the society. </u>The writings can cover consolidated topics on social, ethics and sociology with more focus on biomedicine and biotechnology. <em>For example, He can write about society and genetics which can cover understandings and investigations on complexity of genetics in the context of society </em>
The answer is C because its the only one that uses the verb correctly
Answer:
his protests are met with accusations and arrest
Explanation:
The answer is a.. A colon is best used in advance of a new topic or point, and not in the midst of a sentence, as is the case with the other options.