1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lutik1710 [3]
3 years ago
12

Help me please Describe Plessy vs. Ferguson:

History
2 answers:
gladu [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between white people and Black people was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.

Plessy v. Ferguson: Background and Context

After the Compromise of 1877 led to the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, Democrats consolidated control of state legislatures throughout the region, effectively marking the end of Reconstruction.

Southern Black people saw the promise of equality under the law embodied by the 13th Amendment, 14th Amendment and 15th Amendment to the Constitution receding quickly, and a return to disenfranchisement and other disadvantages as white supremacy reasserted itself across the South.

As historian C. Vann Woodward pointed out in a 1964 article about Plessy v. Ferguson, white and Black Southerners mixed relatively freely until the 1880s, when state legislatures passed the first laws requiring railroads to provide separate cars for “Negro” or “colored” pa_sengers.

Florida became the first state to mandate segr_gated railroad cars in 1887, followed in quick succession by Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana and other states by the end of the century.

(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. ... As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How do the two maps of the Barrow plantation, roughly twenty years apart, illustrate the effects of emancipation on rural life i
nordsb [41]

Answer:

The whole place was changed after twenty years.

Explanation:

There was a great effects of emancipation on rural life in the South of America after twenty years of the civil war. Before civil war, there are quarter in which slaves were living there but after the civil war, the slaves becomes free citizen and these former slaves adopt the profession of sharecroppers. These former slaves lives in their own houses, having a church and school.

3 0
3 years ago
Congress's power to override a veto and impeach a president is an example of
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

The correct answer is option:

<em>C. Party Politics .</em>

Explanation:

The executive branch president can veto a rule, but with enough votes, the legislative branch may override the veto. The legislative branch ( a Political Party ) has the authority to approve presidential appointments, to monitor the budget, and to impeach the president and remove him or her from office.

5 0
3 years ago
Describe the philosophy of Manifest Destiny. What effect did it have on Americans’ westward migration? How might the different g
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

In the nineteenth century, the doctrine of Manifest Destiny was a common belief among the inhabitants of the United States that American colonizers should expand in North America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. It expressed the belief that the American people were elected by God to civilize their continent.

The Manifest Destiny was not a thesis embraced by all American society. The differences within the country itself about the objective and consequences of the policy of expansion determined its acceptance or resistance.

The northeastern states believed for the most part that the United States should take its concept of "civilization" throughout the continent through territorial expansion. In addition, for US commercial interests, the expansion offered large and lucrative access to foreign markets and thus allowed to compete in better conditions with the British. Having ports in the Pacific would facilitate trade with Asia.  

The southern states sought to extend slavery. New slave states would strengthen the power of the south in Washington and would also serve to place the growing slave population.

This north-south conflict became clear with the question of Texas's entry into the Union and was one of the main causes of the future Civil War.

There were also political groups that saw the excessive territorial extension as dangerous; they believed that their political system and the formation of a nation would be difficult to apply in such a vast territory. This position was defended as much by some leaders of the Whigs as by some expansionist Republican-Democrats, who argued about how much territory should be acquired.

Another point of discussion was the use of force. Some political leaders (whose maximum exponent was James K. Polk) did not hesitate to try to annex the largest possible territory even at the risk of triggering wars (as in fact happened) with other nations. Others opposed (albeit timidly) the use of force, on the grounds that the benefits of their system alone would suffice for the territories to join voluntarily.

It can be said that the own supporters of the "Manifest Destiny" formed a heterogeneous group with different interests.

3 0
4 years ago
Which of the following best describes the 1957 events at Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas? Governor Faubus resisted
Montano1993 [528]

The correct answer is  Governor Faubus resisted the school’s integration with National Guard troops, and President Eisenhower sent federal troops to enforce integration.

After the Supreme Court case Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) the federal government called for the desegregation of schools all across America. This included Central High School. Central High School was previously an all white school. After Brown vs. Board of Education ruled segregated schools illegal, 9 black students enrolled at Central High School. These individuals would be known as the Little Rock 9.

After enrolling, these students tried to attend Central High School but were kept out by the national guard troops. This was due to Governor Fabius's disagreement with integrating white and black schools. However, President Eisenhower enforced the federal ruling by sending in federal troops to enforce the new ruling, allowing black and white students to attend the same school.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one major result of two countries choosing to specialize in the
9966 [12]

Answer: B

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country is Japan’s major trading partner?
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the best example of a secondary source document useful in the study of history?
    11·2 answers
  • How did Frederick Douglass feel after Mr. Auld lectured Mrs. Auld for teaching Douglass to read?
    8·1 answer
  • Who was most responsible of drafting the declaration of independence?
    15·2 answers
  • In which branch of the government does a mayor operate
    15·2 answers
  • Could someone please help me..?
    13·1 answer
  • According to Smith why would a baker who makes baked goods that taste terrible in charge is high price is not stay in business v
    10·1 answer
  • Akhenaten was not liked by the people of Egypt during his reign as pharaoh. What change did he make for the Egyptian people?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these new ideas was most common among midle-class people
    9·1 answer
  • Japanese soldiers killed hundreds of thousands of chinese civilians in the:.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!