1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eddi Din [679]
3 years ago
6

Texas Revolutionaries won the battle at the Alamo, true or false?

History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

i believe it is a false

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What english speaking country was on the edge of Japanese-held territory during the World War 2?
Naya [18.7K]
That English speaking nation was Australia. 
8 0
3 years ago
N 1802, the French people voted to keep Napoleon in power, giving him the right to
Dmitry [639]

Lead the French army.

3 0
3 years ago
the quebec act granted legal toleration to the roman catholic church in canada, which alarmed colonists who believed the british
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What actions on the part of Great Britain were the primary causes of the War of 1812?
kumpel [21]

The actions of the British that led to the War of 1812 were:

  • restrictions on US trade
  • forcing American sailors to join the British Navy

In the first decade of the 19th century, Britain was at war with France but both countries continued to trade with the U.S. and this led to tensions.

War eventually broke out between the British and the U.S. because:

  • the British were blockading France and refusing to allow the Americans to trade with them
  • the British were capturing American sailors and using them to man Royal Navy ships
  • the U.S. wanted to expand into Canada and saw this as an excuse to do so

In conclusion, the War of 1812 would not have happened if the British were not restricting U.S. trade and forcing American sailors into the Royal Navy.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/20802332. </em>

4 0
3 years ago
What tactic used by the management of a company could be considered the opposite of a strike
Lostsunrise [7]

One of the most effective tools utilized by management was the introduction of scabs or replacement works. The purpose of any strikes is to destabilize the work regimen in a plant or factory to obtain concessions from management. Scabs disrupt this process by crossing picket lines and continuing the work process. In this way, the strike is essentially undermined. Moreover, the striking workers were not allowed to return and thus forfeited their jobs.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did john marshall affect political development in america?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the cause of the Sepoy Rebellion?
    11·1 answer
  • if you were Japanese American would you have responded in the same way as the Japanese Americans did during world war II? explai
    5·1 answer
  • What two long term trends mark the expansion of the american electorate
    15·1 answer
  • HELP 10 POINTS!!!<br><br> Saul was a: <br><br> scribe <br> Pharisee <br> Sadducee <br> Essene
    10·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the opening of an argumentative multimedia presentation?
    10·2 answers
  • The Mongol invasions in Asia
    9·1 answer
  • Who was expected to repay the war debt of the French and Indian War? B. Spain A. The colonists D. France C. Great Britain​
    7·1 answer
  • !00 Points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Brainliest!!!!!!!
    10·2 answers
  • How did a person's economic class influence his or her life in a 19th- or early 20th-century urban center?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!