1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-s [515]
3 years ago
13

The production-possibilities frontier separates outcomes that are possible for an individual (or a group) to produce from those

which_______. a. are scarce. c. cannot be produced. b. have utility. d. are efficient.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Alex73 [517]3 years ago
5 0
I think it's b because they need to be seperated.
trapecia [35]3 years ago
5 0
<h2>the answer > b. have utility</h2>

because the production possibilities frontier are  achievable, but don't make full use of all available resources

You might be interested in
This natural landmark can vary greatly in size as a result of flooding and evaporation. What is its correct name and location?
Stells [14]
<span>Great plains, Nebraska</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Observando el mapa ¿que porcentaje corresponde a zonas de proteccion ambiental, ganaderia y agricultura?
olasank [31]

La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

Desafortunadamente, se te olvidó incluir el mapa. Sin el mapa, no podemos ayudarte. No sabemos qué es lo que describe el mapa.

Sin embargo, con la idea de ayudarte, podemos comentarte lo siguiente en términos generales deseando que te sirva de algo.

Las zonas de protección ambiental, ganadería y agricultura tienen que ser perfectamente especificadas en los mapas para que la gente y los desarrolladores urbanos las respeten y no quieran pasar por encima de las leyes y edificar construcciones en lugares que están protegidos.

Para ello, las Secretarias de Medio Ambiente o los Departamentos de Conservación de Recursos Naturales, deben estar vigilando constantemente esas zonas protegidas porque de lo contrario, los desarrolladores urbanos comienzan la tala de árboles y la invasión de tierras ecológicamente protegidas.

5 0
3 years ago
Global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducte
Lunna [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

Indeed, global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducted on the effects of global warming and what we might do to mitigate any threats. I think some policymakers are wary of the findings and some can trust that the conclusions are sound for the following reason.

Politicians are wary because, in reality, there are no 100% conclusive arguments that confirm that global warming is the result of humans. For other politicians, the evidence provided by environmental institutions is valid and they are prompt to proclaim that humans are to blame for global warming.

What is real, is that earth scientists think that global warming caused significant climate change in the past. And when they say the past, they mean a time before humans appeared on planet earth.

Climate change or global warming is not new for planet earth. It is a phenomenon that has happened in the past according to scientists and national agencies. It is believed that global warming had caused natural disasters such as the melting of ice caps and the flooding of many lands on Earth, destroying life forms.

That is why right now, many agencies are closely researching climate change. Among those institutions are the US National Academy of Sciences, the Geological Society of America, the American Meteorological Society, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

3 0
3 years ago
What problems could arise if the United States tried to become self- reliant and eliminated most of its trade with its trading p
aivan3 [116]
Well, America Would basically fall apart. It causes many things to go wrong.
5 0
3 years ago
What was a direct effect of the Emancipation Proclamation?
Eduardwww [97]
The Emancipation Proclamation changed the focus of the war. Up until September 1862, the main focus of the war had been to preserve the Union. With the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation freedom for slaves now became a legitimate war aim. It also allowed 'Colored' men to join the US Army.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the capital of the United States?
    9·2 answers
  • Darius is learning the names of two or three new objects or events every day. This rapid increase in vocabulary is referred to a
    8·2 answers
  • What work of science has surprised, unsettled, or challenged you, and in what way?
    8·1 answer
  • When has federal government forced a state to act against its wishes
    10·1 answer
  • The position of your seat has nothing to do with the effectiveness of the headrest.
    13·1 answer
  • In which activity did colonists directly change the natural environment? Options
    5·1 answer
  • What is the BEST summary of the section "Supreme Court Justice"?
    15·1 answer
  • What does the nurse recognize as the most likely explanation for the self-mutilating behaviors that occur with borderline person
    7·1 answer
  • Eastern beginning point of the Union Pacific Railroad (CITY) ​
    12·1 answer
  • ________ was proposed by herbert spencer and is used to argue that poverty is nature's way of excreting the unfit members of soc
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!