The incorporation of the bill of rights is a doctrine that defends that The Bill of Rights should be applicable and respected by the states of the US.
Initially, the Supreme Court was strict on this matter and the common understanding was that the Bill of Rights should only be respected and followed by the Federal Government - you can see it on Barron vs Baltimore case. After the abolition of slavery and the post-civil war era many rights were granted to people and over time the incorporation doctrine gained strength.
A) Kids could be payed less
Answer:Yes
Explanation:Because in the eyes of the politicians a country that runs is better than no country at all. And politicians were already currupt back then as well.
the purpose of checks and balances was to to ensure that no one branch of government gets too powerful
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
