Microeconomics, sociology, statistics, math, accounting, etc.)
The correct answer would be the second option. The correct plan for his experiment would be that the temperature, the type of limestone, and the type of acid are controls. The amount of acid and the amount of damage to the limestone are variables. To determine the degree of damage of the acid it would be best that the amount of acid is the manipulated variable while everything else are assumed constant.
A person who feels very good after receiving a compliment, but very bad after being insulted, would sore high on measures of
<u> "self-esteem variability".</u>
The connection of self-esteem variability to identity, state of mind, and conduct was explored. Self-esteem variability was estimated by figuring the standard deviation of self-appraisals made amid seven days of experience-examining. Members high in self-esteem variability were reluctant, socially on edge, and avoidant of social settings. Confidence fluctuation was mostly free of the theoretically comparative attribute of affect-intensity.
Answer: A. Expressing rage over the terrible plight of drug addicts to demonstrate her intense commitment to change
Explanation: What will certainly not increase credibility with the audience is expressing rage. While it may seem that expressing rage and anger is good for showing commitment to a problem, a desire for change, and that Amy cares about reducing the suffering of drug addicts, rage shows that there is a lack of composure with Amy, and composure is key when one wants to gain credibility, because anger can point to certain shortcomings of anyone who wants credibility at all costs.
On the other hand, showing keen interests and enthusiasm for problem solving indicates dynamism, while quoting adequate sources to confirm claims and fluent speaking are elements of competence, that is, someone who has the competence to solve a problem.
