Answer:
B> - If the ruling dynasty was fair, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.
Explanation:
The Mandate of Heaven was a belief in the establishment of a ruler from the qualities of a person. Under this Mandate, there is no specific rule that determines who can or cannot become the ruler. Rather, a person's qualities, such as being fair, just, how well he can rule, or how 'good' he is in terms of his behavior and qualities.
The belief that such a ruler is determined from the internal qualities comes from the idea of the ruler being the "son of heaven". In other words, such type of person is good, just, kind, fair, and does not indulge in immoral or bad activities, which makes him ideal for a leader. Moreover, he will also be accepted by the gods, which is a huge factor.
So, <u>if a ruling dynasty or a ruler is fair, he can keep the Mandate of Heaven</u> but if not, then the Mandate cannot be his.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
The use of mandarins who traveled throughout China overseeing the implementation of Ming imperial dictates is most comparable to "<span>a. Persia's ghazi," since they acted as the "eyes and ears" or their respective rulers. </span>
Answer:
He felt the U.S Constitution put too much power in the government. His influence created the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
Your answer to this is C (It is important for workers to use care when beginning an archaeological dig.)
Answer:
Blowing them up
Explanation:
They strapped bombs to their children and then blew them up
