Hi! It appears you have asked the same question twice. I will quote my answer to the same question you already posted:
"the only sentence which uses semicolon correctly is the first sentence, option A!
- <em>A. Chris and Molly were delighted to see the whole family gathered in the living room; the group was waiting to congratulate the couple.</em>
We use semicolons in sentences between two <u>independent clauses</u> instead of a transitioning or linking word (conjunctions). "
Hope this helps!
Answer:
She left something that cannot be occupied; She left us something that couldn’t be found.
I’m not the best at this so I may not even be right but I may have helped?
The answer is A) <span>communicate a profound truth every time.</span>
Answer:
Yes, it's correct
Explanation:
The nonsmokers have the right to tell smokers not to pollute their air, it follows that people who don’t own cars have the right to tell car owners not to drive, because the air from smokers (tobaco, etc.) can create bad impacts on others' health and if the car owners do not know how to drive and still drive their cars carelessly, it will cause the traffic accidents. So, you do not need to own any cars to have the right to tell car owners not to drive.
Answer and Explanation:
Quote: "The fourth is freedom from fear—which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor—anywhere in the world.
"
Explanation: The above quote can use two rhetorical appeals, the first is pathos, which refers to emotional appeal. This appeal can be seen when Roosevelt says that the fourth freedom is freedom from fear. This evokes a feeling of aversion to fear, causing society to see it as something negative and to have emotions contrary to it, stimulating the hope that it will be exterminated. The quate also uses the rhetorical appeal called logos (which evokes logic) because it shows that fear is created by the possibility of violence and that violence is often stimulated by the amount of weapons in a society. Therefore, it is logical to say that by decreasing the amount of armaments, violence is reduced and fear is reduced.