Answer:
A criticism of the judicial branch is that it has less of a check and balance than the other two branches in the sense that when it declares something as unconstitutional, the other two branches cannot veto or undo this decision. Basically, it has the power to make any law or decision unconstitutional without a check on that power. I disagree with this because the judicial branch has not declared anything unreasonably unconstitutional and they mostly use this power in ways that help the country as a whole
Explanation:
In June 1812, the United States declared war against Great Britain in reaction to three issues: the British economic blockade of France, the induction of thousands of neutral American seamen into the British Royal Navy against their will, and the British support of hostile Indian tribes along the Great Lakes frontier.
Checks and Balances because one branch keeps the other one in check
This is referred to as Nationalism. It is the notion or belief that one's country possesses qualities or traits not found in that of other nations. It often promotes a sense of exceptionalism and superiority; therefore, it has often led to <em>Chauvinism </em>which is a rather hostile form of Nationalism and is often utilised as a political tool to achieve an ends.
It held for the purpose of bringing Nazi war criminals to justice, the Nuremberg trials were a series of 13 trials carried out in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 to 1946
