Answer:
<h3>
</h3><h3>The Crusades provided an outlet for nobles' dreams of glory. Wars of foreign conquest had occurred before the Crusades, as the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 illustrates, but for many knights migration began with the taking the cross. The Crusades introduced some Europeans to Eastern luxury goods, but immediate cultural impact on the West remains debatable. By the late eleventh century strong economic and intellectual ties with the East had already been made. The Crusades were a boon to Italian merchants, however, who profited from outfitting military expeditions as well as from the opening of new trade routes and the establishment of trading communities in the Crusader states.
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3> </h3><h3>
</h3><h3>The Crusades proved to be a disaster for Jewish-Christian relations. In the eleventh century Jews played a major role in the international trade between the Muslim Middle East and the West. Jews also lent money to peasants, townspeople, and nobles. When the First Crusade was launched, many poor knights had to borrow from Jews to equip themselves for the expedition. Debt bred resentment. Hostility to Jews was then enhanced by Christian beliefs that they engaged in the ritual murder of Christians to use their blood in religious rituals. Such accusations led to the killing of Jewish families and sometimes entire Jewish communities, sometimes by burning people in the synagogue or Jewish section of town.
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Legal restrictions on Jews gradually increased. Jews were forbidden to have Christian servants or employees, to hold public office, to appear in public on Christian holy sites, or to enter Christian parts of town without a badge marking them as Jews.
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>The Crusades also left an inheritance of deep bitterness in Christian-Muslim relations. Each side dehumanized the other, viewing those who followed the other religions as unbelievers. Whereas Europeans perceived the Crusades as sacred religious movements, Muslims saw them as expansionist and imperialistic. The ideal sacred mission to conquer or convert Muslim peoples entered Europeans’ consciousness and became a continuing goal.</h3>
Explanation:
<h3>#hopeithelps</h3><h3>stay safe and keep well</h3><h3 /><h3>mark me as brain liest pls</h3>
Get the forigeners to stop selling opium to the Chinese.
Answer:
Cesar Chavez.
Explanation:
Cesar Chavez grew in a family of migrant workers who provided labor in the fields.
As a result, he got to understand the hardships that the workers face. He thereafter devoted his time and resources to diplomatically fight for the rights of workers.
He formed the national farm workers association, through which he would actualize his agenda. He joined hands with the agricultural workers organizing committee to form the United Farm Workers, after a joint strike against the grape growers.
Years of struggle for change in condition and treatment of the grape growers gave the fruits of farmers agreeing to sign contracts with the workers.
Genghis Khan, originally named Temujin Borjigin, was born on the poor steppes of Mongolia in 1162. Being extremely poor and illiterate, still this man rose to become one of the greatest rulers and conquerors in human history. He came to power in Mongolia around 1206 when he was able to unify several nomadic tribes and transformed them into a political, social and especially military power. And because he had a great military mind, he was able to create one of the strongest and most powerful armies in the world.
What really stands out for me about Genghis Kan was that despite being so ruthless in his conquests, he was also a man who was open to new ideas and did not impose limits on knowledge, religion, art, or any other cultural aspect. He was always open to learning something new and as evidence of this, you see that throughout the time of his ruling, there was a spike of cultural and economical mixing that encompassed European cultures such as the one in Venice with the Chinese culture. When seeing images of Genghis Khan, you think about a rigid man incapable of any kind of intellectual capacity, aside from the military one, but you see that that was not the case.
Studying the legacy of an empire is vital to history because because it allows you not only to understand how the thought processes and behaviors of the time were like, but it also allows you to draw conclusions that teach new generations to repeat what must be repeated and correct what must be corrected.
The Mongols have always been portrayed as savages that came from a really unknown and unthought-of region of Asia and who literally swiped most of Asia and even parts of Europe to form one of the greatest and most powerful empires. However, what you learn after reading about the legacy of the Mongols and especially Genghis Khan, is that they were great military leaders, who believed in the system of rising to power and reknown through accomplishments rather than birth and this made their empire strong and long lasting. Also, the rise of culture and knowledge derived from the oppenness of the Mongols to trading and cultural exchange, was something that you would not have expected from a nation that supposedly rose from savage people. I believe that the legacy was really important and it shaped, especially Asia, for years after it ended.
Explanation:
Enlightenment thought, because of its roots in science and reason, challenged the prevailing authority of the church.
