1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
finlep [7]
3 years ago
7

Should the United State government regulate or tax unhealthy food products?

English
1 answer:
svlad2 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes, taxing unhealthy food products can be a solution to increase people's quality of life.

Explanation:

This is a complex issue, because at first we will say yes, this is a solution to encourage people to eat healthier, because by increasing the price of unhealthy food products, people would choose to consume healthier products.

But the question is not so simple, as there are several ingredients that would need to be taxed, and there is currently a discussion that sugar is the ingredient that should be taxed in the first place, but taxing only sugar can keep people consuming products rich in fats, salt and artificial sweeteners that also cause health problems like obesity and diabetes.

There is also the question that the increase in the price of products does not directly affect the industry, so a solution would be to tax the content of these ingredients added by the food industries, which would encourage these companies to seek to add healthier ingredients to their products.

So it is concluded that the taxation of unhealthy products is a solution within several solutions that can contribute to encourage people to choose foods that contribute to a healthier life. It is necessary that there are public policies that encourage the importance of consuming healthy foods to improve people's health and quality of life.

You might be interested in
About Romeo and Juliet, the critic F.M. Dickey maitains, “love overshadows hate dramaticlly,since it is the passion of the prota
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

Personally, I disagree and agree.

Explanation:

"Love overshadows hate dramatically, since it is the passion of the protaganist and since Shakespeare has lavished his most moving poetry upon the love scenes."

Basically, what he's saying here is that love is more powerful than hate because Juliet/Romeo are so passionate about it. Furthermore, Shakespeare's most famous lines often come from the love scenes in Romeo and Juliet.

Love is not more powerful than hate. In fact, these two emotions are about the same level of intensity. They both require focus on a person/multiple people, they both require energy, and they both are in general, just powerful feelings that have been demonstrated through history. One can be stronger than the other. It just depends on the situation.

Secondly, his reasoning makes sense. Love, in this instance, overcomes the family feud that the two protagionists' families have. So, love does overpower hate in this story. However, take that with a grain of salt, because the love that happens ends in a tragedy. Both protaganists die because they, arguably, loved a little too much.

Thirdly, I don't agree with the statement "and since Shakespeare has lavished his most moving poetry upon the love scenes." Sure, his most famous lines are from these scenes, but that shouldn't be a reason to why love overpowers hate. It should just be an example of what Shakespeare wanted to achieve. He wanted to show that in this instance, love can be more powerful than hate. Does that mean it is in every situation? No.

Those are my ways of seeing it, I hope you get a good grade and I hope you understand Shakespeare, because it is really hard to. Good luck!

7 0
3 years ago
Please help, I need guidance with this question.
Neko [114]
The answer would is B.
8 0
3 years ago
How can authors help you understand whether you are looking at a comparison or a contrast
loris [4]
They can show diffrent peoples idea's on the point
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hassan and his father are Hazaras. What does that mean in Afghan society?
Scrat [10]
Huh what is the question
8 0
3 years ago
What arguments were given in favor of war with Great Britain? What arguments were given against war with Great Britain?
masha68 [24]
Do you mean The American Revolution? If thats the case, the arguments in favor it Britain is that they have the the strongest navy, so without the help of the French (including Lafayfette) they couldn’t stand a chance, and the king(King George III) tried to pay the debt, and prevented the colonists (Americans) from going to the other side, so they don’t have to get into a fight with the natives. As for against, King George took too much control, and even made a declaratory law that he could control what happens in the colonies, and that the colonists would have very little power. He was also taxing them, but they were poor, so they rebelled against him. Sorry if I wrote a book. Also, I hope it helps you!
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the government in harrison bergeron
    13·2 answers
  • Find the dangling modifier<br><br><br> Fishing for trout, our boat tipped over.
    14·1 answer
  • what does it mean to be an American? write a multi-paragraph essay that explains what you believe it means to be an American. pl
    12·1 answer
  • Read the selection and click the letter of the implied main idea of each selection.
    5·1 answer
  • . Clean the room,.....? (Tag) ​
    9·2 answers
  • Which description of the word's pronunciation is correct?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these is an example of anaphora?
    5·1 answer
  • Keep it simple and give your best answer.
    15·1 answer
  • Some aspects of personality are stable and do not change through out one's life. Please select the best answer from the choices
    10·1 answer
  • Why does Edwards claim that nonbelievers are akin to spiders in "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!