If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:. ............$
1. Bad debt Dr. 11.0000
Account receivable Or. 11.000
Narration: Bad debts writing off debtors
2. Cash/Bank. Dr 1800
Profit or loss Cr. 1800
Narration. Bad debt previously written off recovered
3. Profit or loss Dr 4000
Allowance for doubtful debts Cr
4000
Narration. Increase in provision for doubtful debts.
Answer:
The cash flow to stockholders amounts to $45
Explanation:
Cash flow to stockholders is the term which is defined as the cash amount which the company pays out to the shareholders.
The cash flow to stockholders is computed as:
Cash flow to stockholders = Dividend paid - New equity raised
where
Dividend paid is computed as:
Dividend paid = Net Income × %
= $360 × 35%
= $126
New equity raised is $81
So, putting the values above:
Cash flow to stockholders = $126 - $81
Cash flow to stockholders = $45
Answer:
The cost recorded for the equipment=$66,500
Explanation:
When dealing with the total cost of an equipment we take the purchase cost and other additional associated costs that come with the equipment. This can be expressed as;
T=P+A
where;
T=total cost
P=purchase cost
A=additional costs(transportation cost+sales tax+installation cost)
In our case;
T=unknown
P=$60,000
A=(1,000+3,000+2,500)=$6,500
replacing;
T=60,000+6,500=66,500
The total cost=$66,500
The cost recorded for the equipment=$66,500
Answer:
Correct one is Option D.
<u>$6,500</u>
Explanation:
Fair value of its 20% interest in the receivables 8000
Less: Factoring fee=50000*3%
=1500
Amount receivable from factor= 8000-1500=6500
