1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hunter-Best [27]
3 years ago
5

The outcome of the conflict between the Constitution and state laws is guided by

History
1 answer:
lord [1]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Supremacy Clause of the Constitution

Explanation:

Federal law is superior to State Law and this is enshrined in the Constitution by the <em>Supremacy Clause</em> which essentially states that the Constitution and Federal laws are the highest law of the land and state laws or constitutions cannot violate them.

If there is a conflict between the Constitution and state law, the Constitution takes precedence and if there is uncertainty as to whether there is a conflict, Federal courts can be approached all the way to the Supreme Court.

You might be interested in
History lesson 6.01 <br> describe the factory line system and the assembly line
iragen [17]

Answer:

this means that a product moves progressively from start to finish in a sequential manner. Food processing uses production lines to move from raw materials to packaged goods. An assembly line, on the other hand, involves the addition of parts and components to complete a product, such as a car

4 0
3 years ago
Sino ang nahalal na pangulo ng kongreso​
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

pangulong rodrigo duterte po yan po ang sagot

5 0
3 years ago
The byzantine empire replaced the western roman empire after the fall of rome. true false
Nutka1998 [239]
Replaced how?  If you mean like the Roman empire, that would be incorrect.  Both empires considered each other Roman and both empires considered themselves Roman.  So when the west fell, the Byzantines did not 'replace' the western Romans in being Roman. Instead, they just kept on being Roman as their western counterparts fell.  However, for a period, the Byzantines did manage to reconquer parts of the Western Empire and even Rome, but that was relatively short-lived.  In that case, you could argue that the Byzantines sort of did replace the western Romans in being the Roman empire with Rome in its possession. However, that is a stretch in my opinion. 

In short: False, the Eastern Romans did not replace the western Romans as they were both seen as Romans, just with different governments.
8 0
3 years ago
The plantation economy of the south produce
stira [4]
Can you provide any answer choices or reword the question?
5 0
3 years ago
What was a result of the fighting at Lexington and Concord?
Helga [31]

option C is the correct answer

<em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>British</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em> </em>

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was the recount of Florida votes in the 2000 presidential election so important?
    12·1 answer
  • What are 2 spanish laws that influenced texas today
    10·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    11·2 answers
  • How MIGHT the location of the Chattahoochee River have contributed to the development of of trade in Georgia? Question 1 options
    11·2 answers
  • Pick something in your environment describing where a environmental engineer could be useful
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best expresses the main idea of Wilson’s 1914 speech?
    15·2 answers
  • 5. What religious issue acts as a centrifugal force in<br><br> Trinidad and Tobago?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the first major constitutional act that established the place of people of African descent in the Uni
    15·1 answer
  • What facts do you know about Abraham Lincoln?
    15·2 answers
  • I NEED HELP! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!