Answer:
1. Which Statement is true:
B. low p/e ratio could mean that the company has a great deal of uncertainty in its future earnings.
2. Qualitative analysis:
According to your understanding, a company with less competition is considered to be (more or less) risky than companies with a wide multiple competitors.
Explanation:
Company A's Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio is calculated as the market price of its shares divided by the earnings per share. It shows the value investors have over a stock. With a high P/E ratio, the company's stock could be over-valued, or investors are expecting high growth rates in the future. This is unlike a low P/E ratio that shows that the stock is undervalued or that investors are not expecting high growth rates in the future because of uncertainty.
Without competition, Company A is riskier than Company B which operates efficiently and competitively. There is that competitive edge that competitive companies possess. Monopolies do not enjoy that advantage. It is, therefore, riskier to have no competition.
Answer:
Note: Missing question but the full question is attached as picture below
The Cash dividends paid to common stockholders can be obtained the financing activities section of the Consolidated statement of cash flows tagged (Payments of dividends and dividends equivalents)
Cash dividend paid
Common stock issued and outstanding Cash dividends
(a) September 30, 2017 $12,769,000,000
(b) September 24, 2016 $12,150,000,000
Answer:
Urgency / Postponement leads to customer inelastic demand of ice melt.
Explanation:
Elasticity of demand is responsive change in demand of good, due to change in price. Formula = % change in demand / % change in price
Factors Affecting Price Elasticity of Demand : Nature of commodity, Income, substitutes availability, time period, urgency / postponement, share in total expenditure,
Inelastic Demand is when demand responds proportionately less to price change. % change in demand < % change in price
Case 'Customer critically needs ice melt to drive to work' : This has inelastic demand i.e demand less respondent to price changes (he will buy that at high price too). Such because of the urgency of this demand & less scope of its postponement.
Answer:
2,400 Yens
Explanation:
exchange rate for buying Japanese Yen is 12 Yens per Dollar
1 dollar : 12 Yens
how many Yens do you need to buy 200 Dollars for?
Let
x = number of Yens needed
200 dollars : x Yens
Equate the ratios to find x
1 dollar : 12 Yens = 200 dollars : x Yens
1/12 = 200/x
Cross product
1 * x = 12 * 200
x = 2,400
x = number of Yens needed = 2,400 Yens
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
