1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brilliant_brown [7]
3 years ago
5

Can someone answer these 2 questions?? i’ll give brainliest!!

History
2 answers:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

28. end of Soviet Domination of Eastern Europe

29. with violence and physical repression

Explanation:

kozerog [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Question 1: End of the Soviet Domination of Eastern Europe.

Question 2: With violence and physical repression.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
one of the most inportant stock exchanges in the world is the Washington stock exchange​ true or false
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

As important as the Washington stock exchange may be, there are many other SEs way more important, like NYSE, BSE and NASDAQ.

3 0
3 years ago
Patrick is an Irish immigrant in New York City who hears about the Emancipation Proclamation. What is his reaction likely to be?
frozen [14]
Patrick will probably be happy to hear that the slaves have been freed because it was a joyous moment in US history. On the other hand, it shouldn't affect him one bit personally since he is Irish and the Emancipation Proclamation was important for African-Americans.
6 0
3 years ago
What was one effect of the international slave trade?
torisob [31]
One negative about the slave trade was that it tended to increase the amount of war that occurred in West Africa. The reason for this is that European (and American) slave traders did not simply go out into the African countryside and kidnap their own slaves.  Instead, they bought slaves from the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms generally got slaves to sell through war and through raids against inland tribes. Because the slave traders wanted more slaves, the coastal kingdoms were encouraged to wage more wars and conduct more raids against their neighbors. In addition, those kingdoms were provided with things like guns in exchange for slaves. This helped those kingdoms have a greater capacity for waging war.

This brings us to the one (short-term) benefit of the slave trade: it initially helped the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms became richer and more powerful because they were able to get guns, money, and other things in exchange for the slaves. 

However, even these kingdoms were hurt in the long term. This is because the slave trade hurt all of West Africa. First, the slave trade took away millions of Africans (men more than women) in the prime of their lives. This badly disrupted both the cultures and the economies of the African nations. Because they were disrupted, they were less able to progress. The link below argues that the slave trade made it harder for Africa to enjoy an agrarian revolution and, in turn, an industrial revolution. This is because the men and women who could have helped make these revolutions were being taken into slavery.  Because the African nations did not develop economically and because their societies were weakened, they were unable to effectively resist the Europeans when the Europeans started to colonize Africa.

Thus, we can say that Africa was badly harmed by the slave trade. The trade made war more common, harmed the economies and societies of the nations from which the slaves came, and eventually made it easier for Africa to be colonized by the Europeans.
7 0
3 years ago
Which three countries did president bush accused of state-sponsored terrorism?
umka21 [38]
There were actually seven countries President Bush accused of terrorism: Sudan, North Korea, Libya, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, and Syria......
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did European imperialism contribute to the start of World War I?
Darina [25.2K]
A short answer is that becasuse of the imperialism of European nations there was a growing dissatisfaction in those nations who did not have any colonies. Due to not having colonies they argued for a redistribution in colonies so that it would be more equally and fairly shared. Because this didn't happened (among with A LOT of other reasons), World War I ensued. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following tactics was not used by trade unions?
    14·2 answers
  • What were some of the signs that the prosperity of the 1920s was superficial?
    9·1 answer
  • Name of law that was declared unconstitutional in mcculloch v maryland
    13·1 answer
  • What were wild Norse Warriors called?
    12·1 answer
  • By the end of the war, the Allies realized that it would be advantageous to fight the Axis forces in multiple locations at the s
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Roman government allowed this to happen? Why didn't they stop this?
    11·1 answer
  • Which description of the term caliph is correct?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did farming tribes plant their crops on hilisides?
    10·1 answer
  • How do you think the countries of eastern Europe responded to Germany’s attempts to acquire “living space?” What about the Unite
    10·1 answer
  • The Phoenicians were found CLOSEST to which of these numbers on the map?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!