Answer:
what did you read? I can maybe help you once I read it
The author uses the parenthetical clause in the passage to assert that hope is important regardless of whether it comes to fruition.
<h3>What is a
parenthetical clause?</h3>
A parenthetical is a short sentence that is not essential to the rest of the sentence but does not mean that it is not important to the sentence.
The clause of parenthetical are separated from the rest of a sentence but adds an extra information without changing the meaning of a sentence.
However, the clause"though hope should always be deluded" was used primarily to assert that hope is important.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Missing options <em>"A. convince the audience that the pursuit of happiness is futile B. assert that hope is important regardless of whether it comes to fruition C. discourage the audience from indulging in unreasonable expectations D. highlight the positive and negative aspects of hope E. imply that the value of hope depends on its close connection with delusion</em>
Read more about parenthetical
<em>brainly.com/question/1260394</em>
Ghost of the future for me is how i picture death
Answer:
<u><em>I was asked to keep a record of all the attendees of the seminar by the organizing committee.</em></u>
Explanation:
Phrases are words, short groups of words that are used to refer to something else. They cannot be taken in the literal sense and maybe a means to refer to something else.
The phrase <em>"keep a record"</em> means to keep certain information safe.
So, making a sentence using the phrase <em>"keep a record"</em> is-
<u><em>I was asked to keep a record of all the attendees of the seminar by the organizing committee.</em></u>
Answer:
The basis of this argument is that verbs are conjugated only in the present and past tense. If we want to refer to the future, we have to use the auxiliary verb will, or the be going to phrase followed by the verb in present or past, or the present tense. Since in English, there is no change in the conjugation of the verbs for the future, some linguistics claim that there are two tenses (past and present) while others claim that there are three because we form the future tense with the addition of the auxiliary or use present simple or continuous.
Explanation:
Linguistics such as Quicker Al claims that there are two tenses, present, and past since they are expressed by inflections in their verbs, while future does not have inflections. There is no future tense, but there is future time. Time is related to our perception of reality, making the future subjective. On the other side, tense expresses when an action happens, taking into account the moment that the person is speaking. Linguistics such as Hatav or Klein claims three tenses' existence, past, present, and future. They state that we can refer to the future with the addition of the auxiliary verb will, or the phrase be going to, or the use of present simple, or continuous even though there is no specific inflection in the verb, as it happens in other languages like Portuguese or Spanish. They identify the future with the definition of tense.
