Mitty imagines himself flying a navy airplane. Mitty imagines he is a surgeon, and then he imagines himself as a doctor. He also imagines himself as an ace fighter pilot. In conclusion, Mitty imagines himself as a hero. <span> in reality, he is entirely normal, and other people barely notice him.
Hope this helped,
MacKenzie H.</span>
Answer:
Nature because nature doesn't belong to anyone.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. "Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say. "Wait.”
Explanation:
The above evidence in this passage best supports the stated claim.
From the excerpt, the author reveals that when people have not had a taste of the bad effect of segregation, they will say "wait" and keep hindering action. This is in line with Dr. King's statement which also reveals that people who have not tasted the hatefulness of segregation will not see the need to take action.
But those who experience and see how vicious mobs lynch their parents and go to the extent of drowning their siblings at whim; and they see the hate filled policemen as they curse, kick and eventually kill their black brothers and sisters; they will rise up to take action.
This is generally true because when people have not experienced certain things, they will not see the reason end to act. Injustice will stir the call for justice.
Answer:
Demonstrative Speech
Explanation:
The demonstrative discourse is one that shows how a certain situation happened and what was the result, or that shows how a certain element works. This speech can be seen in the text shown in the question above, since the narrator demonstrates what Bod's mission was, how he accomplished it and the result he obtained.
Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize stands in front of a room full of important government people; he wants his audience to recognize that being indifferent is not the same as being innocent – indifference, “after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred”.
He forces the listeners to wonder which kind of people they are. To him, during the Holocaust, people fit into one of “three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders” and he forces the bystanders to decide whether or not to stay indifferent to the actual situation. He takes the time to list various actual civil wars and humanitarian crises (line 17 of his speech) and contrast them with WWII.
He makes sure that his audience realise what is at stake “Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment” [for mankind]. He wants the audience to be really affected by what they hear – so he talks to them in their condition of human being: “Is it necessary at times to practice [indifference] simply to … enjoy a fine meal and a glass of wine”. And he also talks to them as government people with their duty and the power they have over the actual conflicts. He wants them to compare themselves with their predecessors during WWII: “We believed that the leaders of the free world did not know what was going on … And now we knew, we learned, we discovered that the Pentagon knew, the State Department knew.”
Wiesel finishes his speech by expressing hope for the new millennium. We believed he addresses these final words to those who will refuse to stay indifferent. But it seems that Wiesel would count them in the minority: “Some of them -- so many of them -- could be saved.” probably refers to this minority.
