1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bazaltina [42]
3 years ago
14

How did the Civil War change America?

History
2 answers:
Oliga [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

ended slavery with the emancipation proclamation, and overall united the north and south citizens.

Explanation:

max2010maxim [7]3 years ago
3 0
It was the end of one American era, the beginning of another. Gone were slavery, the plantation system and, with them, the Old South. Industrial capitalism, the catalyst behind the Union’s triumph, was poised to lift America into an age of unprecedented prosperity.
You might be interested in
How did Prohibition divide the nation?<br> i need the answer for gradpoint
Charra [1.4K]

The prohibition banned alcohol in America.  Many people didn't want it banned while many people did want it banned.  This divided the nation by having two opposing sides of a big "problem"

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How have international relations shaped and guided the development of the United States, specifically the nation’s government, p
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

International relations, the study of the relations of states with each other and with international organizations and certain subnational entities (e.g., bureaucracies, political parties, and interest groups). It is related to a number of other academic disciplines, including political science, geography, history, economics, law, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.

The field of international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Whereas the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. The traditional view that foreign and military matters should remain the exclusive preserve of rulers and other elites yielded to the belief that such matters constituted an important concern and responsibility of all citizens. This increasing popularization of international relations reinforced the idea that general education should include instruction in foreign affairs and that knowledge should be advanced in the interests of greater public control and oversight of foreign and military policy.

This new perspective was articulated by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson (1913–21) in his program for relations between the Great Powers following a settlement of World War I. The first of his Fourteen Points, as his program came to be known, was a call for “open covenants of peace, openly arrived at” in place of the secret treaties that were believed to have contributed to the outbreak of the war. The extreme devastation caused by the war strengthened the conviction among political leaders that not enough was known about international relations and that universities should promote research and teaching on issues related to international cooperation and war and peace.

International relations scholarship prior to World War I was conducted primarily in two loosely organized branches of learning: diplomatic history and international law. Involving meticulous archival and other primary-source research, diplomatic history emphasized the uniqueness of international events and the methods of diplomacy as it was actually conducted. International law—especially the law of war—had a long history in international relations and was viewed as the source of fundamental normative standards of international conduct. The emergence of international relations was to broaden the scope of international law beyond this traditional focal point.

6 0
3 years ago
The constitution was a result of multiple
yuradex [85]
I believe it’s legislation, sorry if I’m wrong
3 0
2 years ago
What made the second wave of the spanish flu so deadly?<br>​
labwork [276]
Historians now believe that the fatal severity of the Spanish flu’s “second wave” was caused by a mutated virus spread by wartime troop movements.
6 0
3 years ago
Legislators from a one-party state will mostly represent the dominant party.<br><br> True<br> False
katen-ka-za [31]
<span>Legislators from a one-party state will mostly represent the dominant party.

True
False



True -  They have to otherwise their position will be abolished</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which led to The division between Sunnis and Shias following the death of Muhammad
    6·2 answers
  • Why did people pray to saints?
    14·2 answers
  • How do you summarize this?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was building the aswan dam was a good idea?
    12·1 answer
  • Why is it important to refute potential counterclaims when writing an
    5·2 answers
  • What is the policy of “appeasement’? How did it prove to be an ineffective strategy?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the expansion of railroads affect American Indians in the West?
    11·2 answers
  • In a kinetic model explain why a metal rod expands when heated​
    9·1 answer
  • What impact did the fall of rome have on western empire
    14·2 answers
  • Under Joseph Stalin, schools were reformed primarily to emphasize
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!