The transformation was a reflection over the line x = -0.5
And the image and preimage can be seen in the graph below.
<h3>
How to identify the preimage and image?</h3>
First, the original vertices are:
L(3, 3)
M(2, 4)
N(-1, 0)
3 vertices means that our figure is a triangle.
Now, the transformed vertices are:
L'(2, -5)
M'(3, -4)
N'(-1, 1)
And the graph of both sets can be seen below.
Now we can try to identify the transformation.
Now, notice that all the points (L, M, N, L', N', M') are equidistant to the horizontal line x = -0.5
This is a clear implication that the transformation was a reflection over the line x = -0.5
If you want to learn more about transformations:
brainly.com/question/4289712
#SPJ1
Answer:
Is it any of the rational numbers? There are an infinite number of rational numbers. Rational numbers are any numbers that can be written as a fraction. All the integers between those two points (-2, -1, 0, etc.) are all rational. Any of the numbers between the points would be too. 1/2, 1/3, 2 1/3, etc.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the picture, we know that ED is equal to DB. Therefore:
2 times ED=EB
2(10)=20
EB is 20
Answer:
168). C
169). C
170). C
Step-by-step explanation:
For the first angle, it is a right angle, so it measures 90 degrees.
x and 50 are complementary angles, meaning they add up to 90 degrees.
So, subtract 50 from 90 to get 40, which is equal to x.
45 and x are supplementary angles, meaning they add up to 180 degrees.
Subtract 45 from 180 to get 35 degrees, which is the measure of angle x.
All angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
So, 70 + 56 = 126, 180 - 126 = 54.
Since the unknown angle is x - 5, 54 + 5 = 59, which the the measure of angle x - 5.
