There are several crucial factors which led to his rise to power.
Several historians have argued that the Great Depression led to his eventual rise and the defrachising of the German populous towards the Weimar Government. Hence it can be argued that National Socialist (the Nazis) came to power more because of their enemies’ weakness and failures than because of their own strengths.
Other historians has said of Hitler and Nazi Party's ideology and promises made to the Germans that made them so popular in the elections. In the period 1930-1935, Nazi party saw a constant and steep rise in votes for them, demonstrating their popularity of their Nationalist movement.
Another major factor would be Hitler's personal charisma and political wit. Afterall, Hindenburg (who was the President in 1933) could have vetoed Nazi parties movement for power, and the communist party saw votes increasing as well between 1929-1933. What led to the exponential increase of support of Hitler can thus be said to be arising from his personality. Hindenburg and the German political elite needed someone charismatic like Hitler to unite the masses, while at the same time, Hitler's widely popular and demagogue style nailed down the political elite need for him (even though they admitted that did not like Hitler).
There are a multitude of reasons which saw Hitler's rise to power, and depending how you argue it, any of the above 3 can be the most important one. And all 3 of the factors I touched above helped Hitler in one way or another to rise to power as the Chancellor and later Fuhrer of Germany.<span />
<span>The foreign policy of the Ronald Reagan administration was the foreign policy of the United As part of the policies that became known as the "Reagan Doctrine",Reagan administration officials saw the apartheid government as a key ongoing guerrilla warfare, and ensuing famine killed 1.2 million Cambodians in</span><span>The Reagan Doctrine </span>
The north because there was no slavery and africans were free
This poem by emily dickinson is actually about the descent into madness or insanity. In the choices given above, the best way to describe it would be a mental loss. In the poem, the speaker uses metaphors relating to funerals in order to describe the current state of her mind. In a sense, we can say that in her mind, she actually lost something and is mourning the death of that "something" in her mind that she lost. In a small sense, we can say that the speaker has lost a bit of herself already, possibly her own sanity.
Answer:
C. It inspired revolts in Europe and South America
Explanation:
A is not correct as many colonies were created afterwards, especially in Asia and Africa.
B is not correct as during this revolts monarchs tried to suffocate rebellions. The best example if Louis XVI and France.
C is correct as many revolutions across the globe started after this one - France, Haiti...
D is not correct as United States were spreading only towards the west parts of their continent.