A conclusion we can draw from the above is that b
. Baghdad had a rich economy that supported a large population.
From the way Yakut al-Hamawi described Baghdad, we can tell that it is a city that has a rich economy because:
- it had many suburbs
- rich bazaars
- finely built Mosques and baths, and,
- villas
For these to be built in a place, the place must have a great economy capable of affording them. We can also tell the population was large as there were over two million people there.
In conclusion, Baghdad was a great city with a strong economy and a large population.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18822055.</em>
The answer is: A: It encouraged people to borrow money to buy stocks.
With the boom, banks began to give loans where they once had not. This risk of borrowing money from the bank was, in most people's view, a rewarding risk.
Answer:
The stability that the Roman, Han, and Gupta Empires brought spurred trade in Asia on the Silk Roads. This greatly benefited all three empires and the areas in between. Wealth and ideas passed along the trade network providing the money and ideas necessary for Golden Ages.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you out!
Answer: It would be C partner ;)
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
(Last time wrote D and i realised after someones comment lol)
(ty for the person who made me notice)
They quickly went from allies to enemies. There was heavy mistrust between each other based on the ideologies of communism and capitalism.
