<span>The best way to determing who is approaching before seeing them is to rely on other senses. For example, if your uncle never showers then you might be able to smell him even if you can't see him coming. In some cases it may also be possible to tell who is approaching by relying on knowledge about their habits. For example, if someone is coming through the door at six o'clock, and your father usually comes by at that time, then that person is probably your father.</span>
I would have to say the answer is C. There were no slaves, Chicago's climate can get cold, and they are all cities (not a lot of farmland), but they are all on waterways.
Answer:
Quota sampling
Explanation:
Quota sampling: It gathers representative data from a particular group of people. In this sampling method, the data is being chosen from a particular sub-group of a population. This is considered to be more reliable as compared to other non-probability sampling methods such as snowball sampling.
Example: A researcher can take 200 males participants between the age of 18-25.
In the given question, the graph represents the quota sampling method.
Answer:
Assessment is the process of gathering information to learn what participants know and are able to do, in order to determine their progress toward achievement of goals and objectives.
Explanation:
The definition given in the example is the general one for the term assessment. In the field of education, the concept of assessment refers to the broad range of methods or resources that educators implement to analyze, measure, and validate the academic aptness, educational development, acquisition of skills, or educational necessities students may have.
Answer:
The answer is option (B) Foot-in-the-door phenomenon
Explanation:
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a technique of getting someone to grant or comply with a large request by initially making small or modest requests.
The technique is based on the logic that if a respondent (the person being asked) can grant an initial small or modest request, then the respondent would be most likely to later grant a larger request that he/she (the respondent) would not have granted if asked outright (without being approached with small requests first).
