Answer:
4.A narrative in which the author describes personal reactions to an event
Explanation: why? Well, when someone talks about personal reactions, they mean something that happened to them. In order to tell you how it went, that have to use a first person veiw
The question is not complete, so i have attached the complete question.
Answer:
The two objects she can put are the paper back and the bar of soap.
Explanation:
From the attached image, we can see that the 3 weights are;
Paperback Book
: 343 grams
Banana: 108 grams
Bar of soap: 117 grams
Now, she wants to find which 2 objects she can put on a pan balance to equal the weight of a 460 gram bag.
Now, to get this, 2 of the given objects when added together has to give 460 grams.
Let's add the weight of the paper book and Bar of soap. This gives;
343 + 117 = 460 grams
Adding any other combination of two of the given weights wouldn't give 460 grams.
Thus, the two objects she can put are the paper back and the bar of soap.
No, sorry. It's not sorry if I didn't help
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, stories can be just as powerful by providing a different perspective on a scenario and showing what can happen if certain events take place or if we allow certain issues to persist. For example, in the novel "The Man in the High Castle", the novel depicts a world where the Nazi Army was allowed to take over the world. Even though it is a fictional scenario, it still shows what the world can turn into if we allow hate to grow and spread. This can be very powerful and allow individuals to understand the dangers of not fighting for a good cause or issue.
Answer:
Deductive argument.
Explanation:
A deductive argument can be defined as a type of argument that begins with a factual statement to draw a conclusion. It is a factual and logical reasoning. This argument states that if the premises are true that the conclusion drawn must be true as well.
It applies a 'top-bottom' principle which means that first general statements are made then these statements are narrowed to reach the conclusion.
<u>In the given statement, two premises are stated either Jack can enroll in full-time school or buy a car. Then the statement got narrowed when he thought to enroll in a full-time school than buying a car. Then the conclusion drawn was that he had to put off buying the car</u>.
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
