Option A. The disadvantage that secondary sources have is that they are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
<h3>What is meant by secondary sources?</h3>
This is the term that is used to describe the data that are known to already be in existence. These are the types of data that can be gotten from journals or from large government data base.
These types of data are very unlike the primary data that the researcher has to source and create for himself. The primary data would be gotten directly from the field by the researcher who wants to carry out an experiment to determine a phenomenon.
Read more on secondary data here: brainly.com/question/14806486
#SPJ1
Complete question
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources? A.They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe. B.They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate. C.They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions. D.They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
Answer: Some citizens were not allowed to vote or hold public office, but maintained the other rights.
Explanation: Hopefully this helps you!! ^-^
1. The population of the United States population had doubled; that meant more demands and work.
2. One of Theodore's central belief's weren't believed in much, and only a few more presidents followed it.
Answer:
Kansas was admitted to the Union as a free state in January 1861, but partisan violence continued along the Kansas–Missouri border for most of the war. The episode is commemorated with numerous memorials and historic sites.
Explanation:
Bleeding Kansas was demonstrative of the gravity of the era's most pressing social issues, from the matter of slavery to states' rights to the class conflicts emerging on the American frontier. Its severity made national headlines which suggested to the American people that the sectional disputes were unlikely to reach compromise without bloodshed, and it therefore directly presaged the American Civil War.[3]
