Answer:
I they can enter the body if the skin is broken
The incest taboo is a universal rule, that is, it is present in all human societies for which there is an ethnographic record. It consists in prohibiting the occurrence of sexual and marital relations between close relatives, as occurs between parents and children and siblings. Its existence would not have resulted from genetic problems, as many imagine, but, above all, from socio-cultural issues, such as the need for social relations guided by reciprocity and alliance between families. If it were a prohibitive rule determined biologically, there would certainly be a taboo of incest among non-human primates, felines, canids, cattle, etc. Therefore, kinship is a relationship constructed socially and culturally, as it happens, just to exemplify, between parents and adopted children.
The recognition and classification of relatives varies from one society to another and there are the most complex rules on incest. An example of this is society the father's brother is called the uncle, the paternal uncle. In certain indigenous societies he is also considered a father and, therefore, his children are brothers (not cousins) of his brother's children. In such cases, the recognition of who is a brother implies knowing with which relatives it is forbidden to have sexual and marital relations. There is, however, the registration of marriage between brothers in ancient Egyptian royalty and among the Incas, among others, but they are exceptions to the rule.
The answer is "C. Kenneth Starr."
The Starr Report was an investigative record of United States President Bill Clinton by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and discharged on September 11, 1998. Vast parts of the report were composed by Brett Kavanaugh, U.S. Preeminent Court appointee.
Starr additionally asserted that Clinton at the same time deferred declaration for seven months and misled potential thousand jury witnesses by freely denying the relationship, and hence perpetrated a criminal lawful offense by declining to testify. When Clinton made his case about his association with Lewinsky to people in general, nonetheless, he was not under pledge and in this way it legitimately was not a felony. There was likewise no confirmation that Clinton carried out witness altering by secretly denying the relationship to these witnesses and requesting that they affirm to support him.
