The opposite would be anti-
A company making profit from genetically modified potatoes would probably only say good things about genetically modified profits, so they'd likely be biased.
A book written by a freelance author whose previous books were about other scientific issues would likely have the book about genetic modification in general, rather than the historical development of it, so his book wouldn't be the best source to use.
A book written by a woman who believes she got sick from genetically modified products would probably be biased against genetically modified products, so her book wouldn't be the best source.
A book written by a scientist who helped develop the technology to genetically modify vegetables would probably know a lot about the historical development, considering he helped develop it. This is the best source to use in my opinion.
I would describe myself as a cloud. Clouds often change in shape. I’’ emotional, my mood always changes, just like the cloud changes it’s shape. Clouds also move slowly on the sky. I did the same too, walk slowly and observe things around me. (Use quilbot so you don’t get in trouble for plagiarizing) ;)
Answer:
Therapeutic cloning uses the cloning procedure to produce a clonal embryo, but instead of being implanted in a womb and brought to term it is used to generate stem cells...
