Answer:
- Violation of personal rights
Explanation:
As per the details provided, the given situation would exemplify a 'breach of personal rights.' It would be considered 'Larceny' meaning 'unlawful taking of the personal property as an attempt to deprive the legal owner of it permanently,' Says the FBI. Therefore, <u>the couple can be charged under the violation of the man's individual/personal rights as they took his money without even asking for his consent</u>. Such a crime has a punishment of imprisonment of the guilty for five years along with the fine depending on the amount or amount of property is taken over and how.
Answer by JKismyhusbandbae: D. Rural Electrification Authority
Why: President Franklin Roosevelt created a series of programs called the New Deal aimed at promoting basically meaning he was helping those who were going through rough times called economic recovery.
Well, for one, Haiti really didn't have anything to offer the United States. No territory. Nothing to trade. Nothing really. But also, the idea of Africans rising up against an oppressive white government and overthrowing them made the United States very nervous, especially since we, at the time, had institutionalized slavery and a culture that was very much steeped in racism. Basically, we were afraid that if we supported the revolution in Haiti, it would encourage our own slaves to revolt against Southern slaveholders.
Answer:
Tyrell possesses <u>referent</u> power.
Explanation:
Referent power is understood to be a term used in social psychology, which designates a type of dominance or obedience that some people exercise over others. The term of referent power is widely used in the business environment, to designate the power exercised by some members, such as managers or middle managers of companies, which through their conduct, efficiency, honesty, charisma, and other personal aspects, are taken as an example by subordinates as a model to follow identifying with the person who wields that power.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Eric is in fact faced by an ethical dilemma. Should he decide to act in an ethical manner and refuse to fill the fresh produce with some older produce, his business could die.
Should he decide to act in a non ethical manner though, his business will continue for some time.
He is faced with the option of being ethical or non ethical.
That is his ethical dilemma.
