Answer:
The Necessary and Proper Clause - located in section 8, Article I of U.S. Constitution- relates to the power of Congress to negotiate treaties, as part of the need to create laws that contribute to the enforcement of other powers.
Explanation:
The options for this question are:
A. The power to declare war
.
B. The power to restrict child labor.
<em>C. The power to negotiate treaties
.</em>
D. The power to print money.
Necessary and Proper Clause gives congress the flexibility to exercise additional powers, considered implied powers, being the negotiation of treaties one of the powers directly related to the clause.
Treaty negotiation involves all international transactions and conventions that are made to achieve mutual benefit, in line with the interests of the nations involved, such as economic and security benefits.
The powers to declare war, restrict child labor and printing money are granted directly to the Congress by the Constitution, and are not related to Necessary and Proper Clause.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/722798
<span>People saw the grim effects of war for the first time in his graphic photos</span>
Answer:
Patriotism cause they are involved in the social duties of a citizen.
people moved from farms to cities
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Te question does not mention any individual in specific, so we assume that we choose the individual we like to write the testimonial.
We choose Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He was an important figure and led the civil rights movement in the United States. He followed the ideals of liberty and tolerance and influenced millions of people. On his positive side, Dr. King could congregate thousands of people to the civil rights movement cause. He set the example. He was at the very front of the protests and marches. One very good thing he had was that he supported peaceful demonstrations, never violent protests. His "Letter From the Birmingham Jail" and "I Haad a Dream" speech, have influenced modern leaders around the world.
On the negative side, probably he could have been more open and tolerant to negotiate with authorities or to join forces with other black leaders such as Malcolm X, that although he used violence in his protests, the union of more African American leaders could have taken the movement to different dimensions and accomplishments.
