The answer would be b and c because what he thought what would happen didnt
Documentation/citation of Info and Ethics.
Answer:
The best option concerning how Grendel's characterization in "Beowulf" differs from his characterization is "Grendel" is:
B. In "Beowulf" he is a static character, but in "Grendel" he is a dynamic character.
Explanation:
In literature, a static character is one that does not undergo important change. He is basically the same from beginning to ending. On the other hand, a dynamic character does go through important internal changes as the plot unfolds. Those changes can be emotional or psychological, for instance.
In the epic poem "Beowulf", the character Grendel is described as a monster incapable of feeling. He seems to exist solely with the purpose of terrorizing and killing men. However, in John Gardner's "Grendel", the character is developed further. He has feelings, and he suffers precisely because he is not capable of conveying those feelings. His actions are misinterpreted, his monstrous appearance being all everyone can see and judge upon. Thus, we can safely say that, in "Beowulf", Grendel is a static character, while in "Grendel" he is a dynamic character.
The conclusion made by the readers about the author is that she believed that the patients can be helped with either of the two methods.
<h3>
What is acupressure?</h3>
Acupressure is the practice where the blocked energy can be healed by putting pressure on some particular points of the body.
From the given paragraph, the readers have analyzed the author that the patients can be treated by one of the two methods. Both the methods, that is, acupressure and acupuncture can be used to make the patient relieved from the pain. But the most ideal practice is to first go with the acupressure and if the pain still persists then go with the acupuncture.
Therefore, the conclusion given in option D would be made by the readers regarding the author.
Learn more about the acupressure in the related link:
brainly.com/question/9903841
#SPJ1
To form the possessive of plurals that do not end in s, add an apostrophe and s.
