Answer:
option (B) 0.833
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Actual number of workstations that will be used on an assembly line = 6
Cycle time of the line = 5 minutes
Sum of all that tasks required on the line = 25 minutes
Now,
Resulting line's Efficiency
= [ Sum of all task times ] ÷ [ Actual number of workstations × cycle time ]
or
Resulting line's Efficiency = 25 minutes ÷ [6 × 5 minutes]
= 0.833
Hence,
The answer is option (B) 0.833
The appropriate response is a moral hazard, it happens when one individual goes for broke in light of the fact that another person bears the cost of those dangers. An ethical peril may happen where the activities of one gathering may change to the impairment of another after a budgetary exchange has occurred.
Answer:
$10,458.30
Explanation:
For computing the cost of new piece first we have to find out the capacity of 1,000 units which is shown below:
Cost of equipment having capacity of 1000 units
= (New equipment capacity ÷ original capacity equipment)^power-sizing exponent for this type of equipment × past purchase
= (1000 ÷ 2000)^0.28 × $10,000
= $8,235.91
Now
Cost of new equipment today is
= Cost of new equipment × (Current cost index ÷ Old cost index)
= $8,235 × (160 ÷ 126)
= $10,458.30
Explanation:
Analyzing the operational problems faced by Hoosier Burguer, it is correct to say that there is a set of organizational functions that could implement improvements in the company. As the improvement of the supply chain management, which would guarantee that the cycle that the product takes from its production until reaching the final consumer was more effective, ensuring that the product arrived in the right quality, in the right quantity and at the right time until the consumer.
It is also essential to improve the sales and marketing functions in the company, in order to implement actions that promote the products, attract more customers and create a better positioning of the company in the market.
Answer:
Have we inventoried the third party relationships that exist in our organization today?
How are we identifying and tracking new or changing relationships?
Have we assessed and prioritized the risks related to those relationships?
When evaluating new relationships, do our selection criteria address risks to the organization?
Where applicable, do our agreements and contracts include adequate terms and conditions to require third-parties to provide independent assurance to mitigate potential risks, convey trust and confidence, and demonstrate compliance with laws and regulations?
Are responsibilities to manage these risks clearly defined individually for each third-party and as a whole?
Are we monitoring the various risks and contract requirements associated with each existing relationship and at what interval?
Are these relationships dependent on subservice organizations?
How do we gain comfort that information provided by third-parties is valid, accurate, and complete?
Does our risk assessment process identify potential negative events resulting from third party relationships and include procedures in place to respond?
