1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timama [110]
3 years ago
11

Can someone answer these two questions...?

History
1 answer:
Levart [38]3 years ago
8 0
In top one
Third
In bottom one also
Third
You might be interested in
How does the Supreme Court use opinion and the intentions of lawmakers at the
Mnenie [13.5K]
What role does the Supreme Court play in the lawmaking process?
Although the Supreme Court may hear an appeal on any question of law provided it has jurisdiction, it usually does not hold trials. Instead, the Court's task is to interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied
7 0
4 years ago
Why did Stalin decline to participate in the Marshall Plan?
Doss [256]
The reason why Stalin decline to Participate in the marshall plan is : Stalin believed that the marshall plan would restore Germany and make it a threat again
(Remember that back then the Soviet union was US' ally when we took down Germany)

hope this helps
4 0
4 years ago
4. Which is NOT a tip provided in the article for having
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

The correct answer is D. It is not correct to try to convince the other person to agree with you when having a meaningful political conversation.

Explanation:

When talking about political issues, they often deal with controversial issues that can turn friendly talk into heated discussion. Therefore, as a way to prevent this, there are certain guidelines that must be taken into account.

Thus, not shouting, speaking personally and contemplating the opinion of the other party are fundamental criteria when it comes to having a serious and friendly political debate. In this way, cordiality regulates the content of the talk, and the acceptance of the thought different from the other (without the need to share it) gives legitimacy to the idea of the other person.

On the other hand, if in the conversation one of the parties tries to convince the other of its ideology, the conversation will most likely fail. This is so because when trying to convince, the other person's belief or conviction is discredited, a question that many people can take as a personal insult. Therefore, it is totally inadvisable to carry out this type of actions.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of these is NOT a criticism of the concentric zone model?
Ganezh [65]
The second one isn't criticism, it's just a fact.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which example describes natural light
nadezda [96]
What are the examples
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country was divided into spheres of influence
    13·1 answer
  • Lee and grant spoke briefly about their meeting during the war?
    9·1 answer
  • How did ancient Egypt end?
    11·2 answers
  • which investment banker helped nineteenth century corporations grow by channeling FUNDS INTO THE PURCHASE OF CORPORATE STOCKS AN
    14·2 answers
  • Why do you think the colonies were successful on the North American continent?
    9·1 answer
  • What happened at the Berlin West Africa Conference?
    13·2 answers
  • When did Germany and Italy unify ? How did this eventually affect europe
    10·1 answer
  • HELP
    11·2 answers
  • Help plz its important
    6·1 answer
  • How did Temperance reformers want to change society? please explain
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!